“…However, over the past 11 years, the founders have gone our separate ways. We have developed distinctly different visions. If there ever was one context-driven school, there is not one now…”
This is Part I of a series of entries on this topic. Links to subsequent parts will be added to the bottom of this entry as they are posted.
Of course, this doesn’t negate or erase the Context-Driven Principles, and Cem has committed to keeping the original content on landing page of the revised site:
“…When you land on this site, you see the context-driven-testing.com landing page (the Principles) as it was when we originally published it. I’ll keep it that way (with the same set of Principles), because several people have found it useful…”
To my way of thinking, the *most* important point made by Cem on the About Page is the following:
…”This notion of evolution comes with a built-in assumption: If my thinking will evolve to something else in the future, it must be wrong today. Progress on my path to better understanding and practice of testing (and of anything else that I’m serious about) includes discovering what needs to be changed in my thinking, and changing it.
This is an important aspect of science. We don’t run experiments to confirm what we already know. We run experiments to prove that what we think we already know is wrong. And to help us develop something better…”
This is the point I’d like folks to focus on.
Context-Driven thinking and approaches are not going away & they have served many of us well. Naming them has also caused some interesting, many unfortunate, and some downright detrimental effects on what I like to call “TesterLand”. As my regular readers are aware, I’ve self-identified as Context-Driven almost since I first heard the term — not just when it comes to testing, but as a description of my approach to life in general. That is true whether or not there is an official School, whether it’s popular, or whether helps or hinders my reputation.
When it comes to TesterLand, the question is… what comes next? Does a new school form? Do folks collaborate or compete for the new rallying cry? I have my own thoughts that I’ll share in a subsequent post, but for now, I invite you to ponder this and decide what it means to you.
Part II: With the Context-Driven School “closed” what’s next?
Chief Technologist, PerfTestPlus, Inc.
Director, Computer Measurement Group
“If you can see it in your mind…
you will find it in your life.”